|
ELWA
estimates that up to 17% of its waste can be recycled at a cost
which is comparable to landfill. Recycling is considered to be the
most environmentally sustainable treatment option.
|
ELWA
estimates that up to 26% of its waste can be composted and/or digested.
Composting is considered to be one of the most environmentally sustainable
treatment options.
|
ELWA
estimates that up to 59% of the waste can be diverted from landfill
as a result of the use of energy recovery and mixed waste recycling.
Modern waste incineration is widely considered to be environmentally
sustainable. The cost of this approach in East London could be comparable
with the cost of landfill within five years of operation.
|
All
waste can be disposed of by burying – called landfill. Energy can
be obtained by the conversion of landfill gas. |
|
Material
recycling is likely to require the establishment of expensive kerbside
collection systems. The cost of recycling is not likely to be cheaper
than landfill for about 10 years. The viability of recycling is
very dependent upon the sale value of recyclable materials.
|
Composting
could require the establishment of an expensive waste collection
system. The cost of composting is not likely to be comparable to
landfill for 15 years or so. The extent to which the composted material
can be used as a product varies considerably.
|
Waste
incineration is considered by some to be environmentally damaging
and possibly involving diversion from recycling. This option may
result in longer planning processes.
|
The
cost of landfill is likely to rise significantly. The rate of increase
will be unpredictable. Landfill is considered to be the least favourable
approach in environmental terms. As local landfill sites close,
ELWA may have to take waste further away from East London.
|